My Airbnb host asked me how I found Reading. And I answered, simply, "unremarkable." And she said: "That's a really good way of putting it."
I decided not to actually stay in Reading, but rather in a small village to the west called Pangbourne, which, unlike Reading, was very remarkable. It really did look like something straight out of Wind in the Willows. I probably could have saved about thirty dollars in train fare had I stayed in Reading proper, but it was well worth it for the satisfaction of walking down tree-lined footpaths everyday as part of my commute.
The house where I was staying had a footpath leading out into a bunch of fields and copses (coppices?) by the River Pang. It made for a great evening walk after sitting in the archives all day. Almost anywhere you are in the British countryside, there are hundreds of these public footpaths. It isn't that they are government maintained like a lot of trails in state and national parks in America. Most (even in the so-called National Parks) are on private land. They are maintained primarily, it seems, by feet over hundreds, if not thousands of years. A lot of these footpaths have been used by walkers and riders since before Europeans even discovered America, so while the landowners may have changed again and again, the public is given Right of Way over the land, and as long as they don't harass anyone (or anything, especially woodland or cattle), anyone can pass through it.
But for an American, with an early education (via "Trespassers Will Be Shot" signs, and the whole Fences Make Good Neighbors mentality there) in the sacro-sanctity of private property, I always feel a) wrong and b) vulnerable when going through a gate like this:
In my head, I know that these fences are not built to keep me out, but to keep the sheep/cows/horses in, I'm still a little afraid of being yelled at, or finding myself with an assfull of bird shot.
A lot of these pathways were once used non-recreationally. They were just pathways between farms and amenities. It isn't uncommon at all to come across ruins of old farmhouses or mills or schoolhouses or inns.
![]() |
an old Inn |
A bridge over the River Pang (which at this point in its progression was unspectacular and more like a stagnant pond than a river). |
As for the University of Reading: well, it is pretty unremarkable as well. Contrary to popular belief, Oxford and Cambridge are not the only good universities in England. They are, however, the oldest and prettiest, though not all the individual colleges, as my fellow 2009 NEH Fellows (couldn't avoid that) will attest, are architecturally inspiring. Churchill College, where we were housed that summer, looks like something out of the Eastern Bloc. I was kind of thinking that The University of Reading would still have a Victorian/Neo-Gothic charm like Durham University or The University of Manchester, but The University of Reading (which it turns out is one of the "second wave civic universities") looks more like Tri-County Tech. In fact, this little brick walkway was the prettiest thing I saw on the whole campus:
Aesthetics of the university aside, The Museum of Rural English Life, was a neat little place with a very friendly archive staff. The museum is housed in a large late Victorian brick house, built for a local merchant in 1880, and converted into a Ladies' Hall of Residence for the University in the 1930s. Now the Ladies reside in co-ed dorms built in the 1980s, and the Museum bought the place about 10 years ago. It is what you would expect for a house built in that era: big windows, ugly tiling, creaky staircases, and dark wood paneling.
For some reason, I can just see the four-horse carriage pulling up to the door. |
The MERL even had a nice little (visitors room), something that nobody else has, for researchers to eat lunch, drink not-half-bad cooler water, and collect local attraction pamphlets. |
My lunchtime view on the one day that it was not raining. |
My set-up in the reading room. I spend a long time every day just staring longingly at my computer at my Eblum. |
And there was no chronological rhyme or reason as you walked through. You'd have a primitive tractor from 1904 beside an iron plough from 1740. Function could sometimes be discerned:
And sometimes could not be....
I have some academic interest in ploughs (is this how Americans spell it? I'm having some linguistic forgetfulness), but this glorious wall of them is a) suspended on 2nd and 3rd story levels b) are not labeled in any way, and c) don't seem to be terribly well bolted down.
Some sort of early wood-powered threshing machine (seems a bad idea to be burning wood in a wooden structure that handles mostly straw). |
A station where you could try on steel-toed farm boots, straw hats, and linen smocks if you were a child and unafraid of headlice. |
Here's a better view of the wall of ploughs, with some sort of post-modern centerpiece depicting the industrialization of agriculture. |
But the chaos of the MERL did not prevent my heart leaping for joy at this wall of about a hundred different kinds of butter paddles. I don't really even know what one does with a butter paddle, but something about seeing them lined up for the sake of posterity made me very happy.
"The smell of that buttered toast simply spoke to Toad, and with no uncertain voice; talked of warm kitchens, of breakfasts on bright frosty mornings, of cozy parlor firesides on winter evenings, when one's ramble was over and slippered feet were propped on the fender; of the purring of contented cats, and the twitter of sleepy canaries." Kenneth Grahame, The Wind in the Willows.
No comments:
Post a Comment